Nestler also had a physical chart, perched on an easel in the courtroom, listing out the alleged co-conspirators.
SNOPES ZELLO PATCH
When video showing defendant Kelly Meggs was presented, Nestler noted the patch he wore, which said, according to Nestler: “I don’t believe in anything, I’m just here for the violence.”Īs the video clips played, the jury also saw a map of the Capitol that Nestler used to situate the action that was recorded by video. Nestler’s presentation included iPhone footage from the attack that the prosecutor used to identify the defendants and other alleged co-conspirators. He said the defendants descended on DC to attack “not just the Capitol, not just our government, not just DC, but our country itself.”ĭuring the Justice Department’s opening, the jury was presented with video footage, maps and other audio-visual tools that prosecutors used to give an overview of their case. and that was their goal – to stop by any means necessary the lawful transfer of power, including taking up arms against the United States government,” he said. “If Congress could not meet it could not declare the winner of the election. The defendants got their opportunity two weeks before the Inauguration, Nestler said. They concocted a plan for armed rebellion to shatter a bedrock of American democracy,” Nestler said. “These defendants tried to change that history. Nestler started with a reference to the “core democratic custom of the routine” transfer of power, which Nestler said stretched back to the time of George Washington. The Justice Department began its opening statement with the accusation that the defendants sought to “stop by any means necessary” the lawful transfer of presidential power, “including taking up arms against the United States government.”
SNOPES ZELLO TRIAL
Here are takeaways from Monday’s trial so far: “You may not like what you see and hear our defendants did,” attorney Phillip Linder said, “but the evidence will show that they didn’t do anything illegal that day.” “When the opportunity finally presented itself … they sprang into action.”Ī lawyer for Rhodes, the first defense attorney to deliver an opening statement told the jurors that they will see evidence that will show that the defendants “had no part in the bulk” of the violence that occurred on January 6. “They said out loud and in writing what they planned to do,” Jeffrey Nestler, an assistant US Attorney, told the jury. Each juror has their own screen to see evidence.
.png "snopes zello")
As the prosecutors sought to use the words of the defendants against them, they also played video capturing the Oath Keepers’ actions in the Capitol and displayed maps and charts to help the jury follow along. The Justice Department’s opening statement featured messages and other communications among the defendants that prosecutors say show the Oath Keepers’ unlawful plotting to disrupt Congress’ certification of President Joe Biden’s electoral win. They have pleaded not guilty to the charge of seditious conspiracy, a charge rarely brought by the Justice Department, and other charges. With the historic case that they had brought against Oath Keepers accused of plotting to attack the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, prosecutors framed up how the jury should think about the allegations with an hour-plus opening statement that kicked off the trial in earnest.įive alleged members of the far-right militia, including its leader Stewart Rhodes, are on trial in Washington DC’s federal courthouse.
0 kommentar(er)
